Story Homes has applied for planning permission to build 205 houses in the Green Belt surrounding Marsden Primary School, which would add more than 10% to Whitburn's population. You can comment on the planning application until 13 March and we encourage all residents to do so. The Forum will be submitting an objection.

There is a residents meeting (not organised by the Forum) arranged for Thursday 5th March 7pm. 
The venue is the Whitburn Methodist Church Hall 
North Guards, Whitburn, SR6 7AF. Entry via the main church doors

A petition has been started here: https://www.change.org/p/protect-and-preserve-the-green-fields-around-marsden-primary-school-whitburn

We have found that the proposal will not lead sustainable development. There aren't enough school places, there is no dentist, and the GP is over capacity. This means people will have no choice but to drive to the places they need to go, which will lead to more congestion on the roads. There is also not enough capacity in the sewer system.

The fields are also being used by waders, including curlew. The proposed compensation fields will be too disturbed and it is unlikely birds will return there.

Building on these fields will do significant harm to the character and natural environment of Whitburn.

Go to  https://planning.southtyneside.info/Northgate/PlanningExplorer/NewApplicationsSearch.aspx and  search for application 260049

A planning inspector has considered the planning application to demolish the Lodge (including Hope House) and build 32 houses. The application was rejected by the planning committee, but the developer appealed to government to have it considered again. The inspector has allowed the development, and the council needs to reimburse the developers for the full costs of the appeal. You can read more about the decision here.

The inspector discussed the concerns with sewage overflows into the north sea and the Ofwat notice that Northumbrian Water is not operating and maintaining its wastewater assets adequately. The inspector concluded that sewage is part of a separate permitting regime and not part of making a planning decision. They also stated that: 

Although the Council considers that is (sic) cannot be assumed that the pollution control  regime governing the handling of wastewater is operating effectively, this is a separate regime governed by separate legislation. (...). ​If the Council’s approach is correct, all housing development that would be served by NW would be unacceptable. This simply  cannot be the case, especially when considering the severe housing shortage in  the area.

Northumbrian Water maintain that they can cope with the additional sewage. The inspector therefore allowed the development. 

The current system is failing. Planning assumes the wastewater permitting regime works, yet it has been shown not to. At the same time, the planning regime is not putting any new requirements to improve wastewater treatment. The Inspector could have required that these homes only be occupied once measures were in place to prevent unlawful discharges, but did not. This leaves wastewater issues unaddressed. 

The Lodge will need to be demolished within 12 months. Before doing this, an archaeologist will make a record of Hope House. Building works will need to start within 2 years.

The closure of the dentist in Whitburn was unexpected for most residents, especially as the new practice will be situated five miles away in St Catherine's Court, Sunderland. We asked MyDentist and the local Integrated Care Board (ICB) for more information on the reasons behind the closure, to understand whether impacts on Whitburn had been taken into account. They told us that the reason why the practice closed was: 

• The Whitburn practice had outdated facilities and limited space. Alongside its location, this made it hard to attract and retain qualified dental clinicians.
• The building in Whitburn is small, with limited opportunity to expand, while it was in need of renovation - these improvements were considered too costly and not viable.
• Mydentist said they would hand back their NHS contract if the relocation was not approved, which would have meant a complete loss of NHS dental access in the area.
• A consultation was held with over 10,000 patients in Whitburn and Southwick. Feedback showed 80% support for the move, but response rates from Whitburn were lower and showed lower levels of support for the move. Concerns raised from Whitburn residents were mostly on distance and traffic.
• MyDentist met with South Tyneside Council and the ICB, and they agreed to moving the practice to Sunderland.  
• Patients were informed of the closure when they were due an appointment.

The Forum has outstanding concerns:

• It seemed that the decision had already been made by MyDentist to move out of Whitburn and the consultation was a tick-box exercise to fulfil requirements set by the NHS and ICB.
• We have now lost an important local, familiar health service that has left Whitburn residents without access to a dentist within short travel distance.
• Travel distance and time has significantly increased,  particularly for older or less mobile patients. A short walk has been replaced with a long bus ride, or the need to use a car.
• No assessment was completed on whether patients will be able to travel to the new practice, either due to lack of car, or due to the fact that bus links are poor to the new site. Travel from Whitburn will require a change of buses and take at least 40 minutes.
• The low response rates from Whitburn, alongside a higher level of concern in the responses that were received, suggests our community is being disproportionately affected. The Forum has also heard from residents who did not receive the consultation at all.
• The  way the closure was communicated meant that many people who did not have upcoming appointments were not informed until a long time after the closure, which caused confusion and uncertainty.
• We believe that more effort should have been made to reach and listen to those who will be affected the most, especially older residents.

We have responded to My Dentist and the ICB with our concerns.

In February 2025, the Council voted against submitting its draft Local Plan for examination for the second time (the first time was in 2024). This decision was influenced by concerns over proposed developments, including plans to build 1,200 homes on green belt land in Fellgate. Whitburn Neighbourhood Forum had outstanding concerns regarding the impact of development in Whitburn and surrounding areas on sewage pollution in the North Sea, in addition to impacts on green infrastructure and the environment. The Forum also disagreed with the high level of proposed housing targets.

Following the Council's decision, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, Matthew Pennycook, intervened. He issued a direction mandating the Council to submit the existing draft Local Plan for examination by 12 March 2025. The reason for the intervention was based on the fact that South Tyneside's current Local Plan, adopted in June 2007, was significantly outdated, and the Council's repeated failure to progress a new plan left the area vulnerable to speculative development.
​
The public examination of the draft Local Plan is scheduled to commence in July 2025. An independent Planning Inspector will assess the plan's legal compliance and soundness, considering factors such as housing and employment needs, spatial strategy, and the distribution of development. Whitburn Neighbourhood Forum intends to participate in this to re-iterate our concerns that no measures have been taken to prevent further sewage pollution, which will worsen if more houses are added to the sewage system. Sewage pollution was the reason that recently two planning applications for development in Whitburn and Boldon were rejected by the planning committee.

Looking ahead, if the current plan is adopted, South Tyneside Council will need to immediately begin preparing a new Local Plan to align with the updated National Planning Policy Framework and its higher housing targets. The current draft Local Plan aims to deliver 309 homes per year. However, changes to the standard method for calculating housing need under the new NPPF increased South Tyneside's annual housing requirement to 623 homes. 

For more information on the Local Plan and its examination process, please visit the South Tyneside Council's Local Plan webpages.

You may have heard about Sunderland AFC’s plans to build solar farms on two fields near the Academy of Light. Although these fields are just outside the Whitburn Neighbourhood Area, the Forum will be responding to the planning application due to its potential impact on nearby Whitburn residents. While we support initiatives aimed at achieving net zero, we are concerned about the significant effects on the Green Belt and the loss of agricultural land. It will also damage the setting and unique rural character of Whitburn, by replacing these fields with industrial and commercial infrastructure, including solar panels, substations, CCTV, and high fencing around the fields.

A Whitburn resident has launched a petition:  https://www.change.org/p/urge-south-tyneside-to-protect-green-belt-land-from-proposed-solar-farm​

More information from SAFC: https://safcsolar.co.uk

You can respond to the planning application until 16 August through the South Tyneside local planning website. 

🏡 In a recent development, Lovell Homes submitted plans for the redevelopment of Whitburn Lodge, proposing 32 houses, including 8 affordable ones. After a public meeting hosted by the Whitburn Neighbourhood Forum, it became evident that the proposal did not align with community needs and lacked sufficient community involvement.

🔍 Forum Findings: Upon detailed review of the planning application, the Forum found discrepancies with the Whitburn Neighbourhood Plan, a document carrying equivalent legal weight to the council's local development plan. Concerns were raised regarding the environmental impact, particularly concerning the discharge of sewage in Whitburn's marine environment. Despite proposed replanting, the redevelopment would result in a 27% loss of natural habitats.

🌐 Missing Information: Crucially, a required landscape and visual assessment was missing from the application, rendering a comprehensive understanding of the proposals' impact on our local landscape impossible.

✉️ Formal Request: The Forum has formally requested the applicant to provide the missing information to ensure a more informed decision-making process.
​
🤝 Community Involvement: As we navigate these changes, community input is vital. Please do share your thoughts below.

More information and the full response is available on our website.

On 7 September, the council cabinet approved the Whitburn Neighbourhood Plan to be formally made local planning policy. That means that the plan will now be used by the council when deciding planning applications in Whitburn.  Before this, the council would only consider national policies and their own local development plan. But now Whitburn residents have set their own rules for development that are set around the village's special character and needs. This means that the community has a meaningful say in the future of Whitburn.

More info on the decision made by the council can be found at: ​https://www.southtyneside.gov.uk/article/14137/Regulation-19-Decision-Statement

You can read the Whitburn Neighbourhood  Plan here.